Model Predictive Control (MPC)
MPC is the advanced navigation brain that enables AGVs to predict future states, optimize trajectories in real-time, and handle complex dynamic constraints. It transforms reactive robots into proactive, intelligent machines capable of smoother and safer operations.
_hero.png)
Core Concepts
Prediction Horizon
The timeframe into the future that the controller evaluates. It allows the robot to "see" upcoming turns or obstacles and adjust speed before reaching them.
Constraint Handling
Unlike PID, MPC explicitly manages physical limitations. It ensures steering angles, acceleration limits, and motor voltages stay within safe hardware boundaries.
Cost Function
A mathematical formula that balances competing goals. It weighs the importance of tracking the path accurately versus minimizing energy consumption or maximizing passenger comfort.
Receding Horizon
The optimization is re-calculated at every time step. Even if a plan was made for the next 5 seconds, it is updated milliseconds later to account for new sensor data.
System Model
A mathematical representation of the robot's physics (kinematics and dynamics). Good MPC relies on an accurate model to predict how inputs affect the robot's state.
State Estimation
MPC requires precise knowledge of the current position and velocity. It works tightly with localization systems (like LiDAR or SLAM) to initiate the prediction loop.
How It Works
Model Predictive Control operates like a chess player for motion planning. Instead of just reacting to the current error (like "I am to the left of the line, turn right"), MPC simulates multiple future paths based on the robot's physics.
At every millisecond, the controller solves a complex optimization problem to find the optimal sequence of control inputs (steering, throttle) that minimizes a "cost" over a future horizon, while strictly obeying constraints like "maximum speed = 2m/s".
Only the first step of this optimized plan is executed. Then, the robot samples its new state, the horizon shifts forward, and the entire calculation repeats. This allows the robot to handle dynamic changes and external disturbances incredibly well.
_diagram.png)
Real-World Applications
High-Density Warehousing
In narrow aisles, AMRs must maneuver with centimeter-level precision. MPC allows robots to execute smooth, non-stop turns while strictly adhering to safety zones and velocity limits, increasing throughput.
Dynamic Manufacturing Floors
Factories are chaotic with moving forklifts and humans. MPC enables AGVs to dynamically update their trajectories to avoid moving obstacles without stopping completely, maintaining flow efficiency.
Heavy Payload Transport
For AGVs carrying tons of weight, inertia is a major factor. MPC accounts for momentum in its physics model, preventing overshooting and ensuring smooth braking that protects the cargo.
Outdoor Logistics & Agriculture
On uneven or slippery terrain, wheel slip changes the vehicle's response. Advanced Non-Linear MPC can adapt to changing friction coefficients to maintain path tracking accuracy outdoors.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between MPC and PID control?
PID is reactive, correcting errors only after they happen based on past and current states. MPC is proactive; it uses a model of the system to predict future behavior and optimizes control actions over a future time horizon, handling multi-variable constraints much better.
Why is MPC considered computationally expensive?
MPC requires solving a complex optimization problem (often quadratic or non-linear programming) at every single time step, usually 20-50 times per second. This requires more powerful onboard processors compared to simple PID loops which require very little math.
What is the "Prediction Horizon" and how do I choose it?
The prediction horizon is how far into the future the controller looks (e.g., 2 seconds or 20 steps). A longer horizon provides smoother trajectories but increases computational load significantly. It is usually tuned based on the robot's maximum speed and stopping distance.
What happens if the internal model doesn't match the real robot?
This is called "model mismatch." If the model is inaccurate (e.g., wrong weight or friction), the predictions will be wrong, leading to poor tracking or instability. Robust MPC techniques or adaptive MPC can help compensate for these discrepancies in real-time.
Can MPC handle dynamic obstacle avoidance?
Yes, and it excels at it. Obstacles can be added as "constraints" in the optimization problem. The MPC solver will find a path that adheres to the kinematic limits of the robot while maintaining a defined safe distance from the moving obstacle.
What is the difference between Linear and Non-Linear MPC?
Linear MPC approximates the robot dynamics as a linear system, which is faster to solve but less accurate for complex maneuvers. Non-Linear MPC (NMPC) uses the full, accurate mathematical model, offering better precision for high-speed or complex robots but requiring much more computing power.
Does MPC require specialized hardware?
For standard AGVs, a modern industrial PC or embedded computer (like NVIDIA Jetson or Intel NUC) is sufficient. However, micro-controllers (like Arduino) are generally too weak to run full MPC solvers effectively.
How is MPC implemented in ROS / ROS 2?
In the ROS ecosystem, the Navigation2 (Nav2) stack provides an MPC Controller plugin (MPPI or varying MPC implementations). Developers define the cost map, vehicle constraints, and cost functions in YAML configuration files.
Does MPC improve energy efficiency?
Absolutely. You can add "energy usage" or "control effort" terms to the cost function. This forces the solver to find smooth paths with minimal acceleration spikes, which significantly extends battery life in mobile fleets.
What is the hardest part of implementing MPC?
System identification and tuning. Deriving an accurate physics model for your specific robot chassis and tuning the "weights" of the cost function (e.g., how much to penalize deviation vs. speed) is often a time-consuming trial-and-error process.
Is MPC suitable for Ackermann steering vehicles?
Yes, MPC is actually preferred for Ackermann (car-like) steering because it explicitly handles the non-holonomic constraints (the fact that the car cannot move sideways). Standard controllers often struggle with these kinematic restrictions.
How does MPC handle sensor latency?
MPC can incorporate delay compensation. Since the controller predicts future states, it can explicitly account for the time gap between sensor reading and actuator response, ensuring stable control even with slight communication lags.